A concise manual on operational-level agreements (OLAs)

Operational Level Agreements

Last updated on: July 24, 2024

All you need to know about OLAs, their importance for organizations worldwide, and practical pointers to frame an OLA for your teams.

What is an operational-level agreement (OLA)?

What is OLA?

An operational-level agreement, commonly referred to as an OLA, is essentially a set of standards set by an organization that stipulates and standardizes the interdepartmental interactions while fulfilling the service.

When fulfilling an common objective involving several teams, an OLA can define the tasks responsible for each team, the duration a team can work on a specific task, the resources that a team is eligible for, and in some cases, even the pricing of the various tasks that a team can charge the organization.

The goal of an OLA is to clearly describe and measure interdepartmental relationships while working on a collaborative activity.

The need for OLAs in IT service management

OLA in ITSM

Within ITSM practices, an OLA defines the relationship between the IT service desk, and other internal departments, while delivering a service to an end user. The OLA is a formal contract that defines the service level targets for each department, the objectives assigned to each stakeholder, and the responsibilities of the internal departments.

An IT service desk often collaborates with other departments and teams, such as the HR department or the network management team, to provide a service for the end user. Since the IT service desk is often the origin of the service request or incident ticket, they are accountable for the service delivery experience. All the other participating departments are accountable only for their share of tasks while fulfilling the service. The teams or departments apart from the IT service desk are one step away from the end user, and the other participating teams or departments have their own objectives that do not concern service delivery experience.

Therefore, the IT service desk carries the responsibility of adhering to a service-level agreement (SLA), which is is an agreement between a service provider and an end user.

To help adhere to the SLA, IT service desks can standardize their working relationship with other departments and subteams through OLAs.

Let's see an example of how OLAs helps

Zylker, a large enterprise, has hired a new employee and the HR team has raised a new onboarding request in its IT service desk portal. The IT services team notes that the request will take seven business days, as stated explicitly in its SLA.

With an open request, the IT team is reliant on a few subteams to complete the process. The IT services team is responsible for these activities:

To ensure the SLA isn't breached, the IT services team sets up an OLA with the procurement team, receiving the assurance that a new workstation will be delivered from the vendor in three days. With the identity management team, IT services establishes an OLA to enroll the new user in the organization directory within one business day. The IT services team takes a day to install the relevant software and encrypt the user's device. Finally, the privacy and security teams are responsible for briefing the new employee about the ins and outs of enterprise data confidentiality, user privacy, and asset security. These teams advise the IT services team that they need one business day to complete these OLA tasks. To summarize the process of using OLAs, the responsibilities within a service request are broken down and shared in a standardized manner with the respective subteams.

Typical OLA tasks and SLA targets

Teams Responsibilities in the OLA Service level targets
Asset procurement Asset delivery in three business days 4 days
Identity management User enrollment in the directory and privilege access management in one business day 2 days
Privacy and security User training to be completed in one business day 1 days

Based on the OLAs, the new employee onboarding service typically would be completed in five business days. However, there could be unforeseen delays, and the service level targets provide important guidelines for how much of a delay (or an OLA breach) is permissible for the service. Further, the SLA also accommodates potential delays by adding a two business day buffer to its fulfillment time. This ensuring that IT services almost always aligns with the SLA timeline, underpinned by comprehensive OLAs.

The three major benefits of OLAs

OLA benefits

The differences between an SLA and an OLA

OLA vs SLA

This example gives a good impression of where an SLA fits compared to an OLA. To put it simply:

An SLA is an agreement between the IT service provider and the end user in the organization, where the agreement stipulates the duration required for service fulfillment, and the service quality needs to be maintained during service delivery.

An OLA is an agreement between internal departments and the IT service provider to deliver a service efficiently without breaching the SLA to the customer.

Here is a quick comparison highlighting both the common and the different components between the SLAs and OLAs.

The eight straightforward steps to draft an OLA

OLA template

An OLA is a joint effort, so it can only be effective with the cooperative of all internal service provider teams, both IT and non-IT. With all the service providers ready to comply with the OLA standards, here is how a typical OLA draft is prepared:

The best practices to manage OLAs

OLA best practices

Implementing an OLA can facilitate an uptick in your service delivery efficiency. Here are a few helpful pointers to keep in mind when you try to implement them in your organization.